Wednesday, April 30th, 2008...8:59 pm
“Fair use is one of the most frustratingly wishy-washy areas of entertainment law.”
Thus sayeth the Hollywood Reporter, which took some time away from boffo box office today to discuss the Harry Potter Lexicon lawsuit. (Hat tip: Erik Sherman’s WriterBiz.) I am interested in this both as a writer and as an occasional follower of IP law. I believe a certain commenter to this blog has told me in the past that fair use is a pretty weak defense, and this article seems to reinforce it. The four-part fair use test seems pretty tailor-made for a judge’s and jury’s eye, but the article says even the judge in this case is feeling a little unsure:
Even Judge Robert Patterson, who will soon decide whether to issue an injunction against the book, twice interrupted the trial to beg for a settlement, saying his ruling could swing either way.
Eek.
Given all that, I wonder if Rowling’s people couldn’t find a way to move this case to the UK, where there’s a different test (although Wikipedia suggests the difference is subtle).
1 Comment
May 1st, 2008 at 1:58 am
>> Given all that, I wonder if Rowling’s people couldn’t find a way to move this case to the UK, where there’s a different test (although Wikipedia suggests the difference is subtle). <<
As the book is being published in the US, the infringement is here. Also, it’s the US publisher that is suing, because that is the one with (presumably) exclusive rights in North America. Rowling would join in to ensure that a court found the case to rest on the proper legal standing (legal concept of a right to take action by the entity actually injured).
Leave a Reply